LucaM's Review History
Page 3 – Showing results 11 to 13 of 13
1 2 3
| Lake House, The (2006) – 2009-06-06 00:54:23 |
|---|
| forget Google ! I've read the reviews on various sites and, frankly, I'm not surprised. I almost saw them coming. "why doesn't she google him ? " "Why don't they send e-mails, pictures, etc" "what's with all this time-travel BS? " and so on and so forth. OK, so this movie is no Oscar material. so what ? it wasn't intended to be in the first place. it's a touching story about loneliness, introversion, search for one's true self, true love, second chances... and the handwritten letters are something that defines the characters. they are not business people, not over-pragmatic, not interested only in instant gratification. Both characters are portrayed as romantic in a nice old-fashioned way, looking for personal touch, for soul-mates, for that "something" that nowadays is , unfortunately, forgotten. this relationship has nothing to do with messenger or google or text messages. it's a connection between two souls, not wireless instant communication. the timelines aren't too clear, I agree, but that makes the intriguing quality of the movie. nothing is served on a silver platter, we have to think, to figure it out, to try to understand...and finally to let go of logic and follow our intuition . it's not easy. and the movie definitely needs to be seen at least twice, to get it right. | Street Kings (2008) – 2009-06-06 00:42:11 |
| it's not what the poster looks like... first of all, must say that this is a movie that benefits from - and actually needs - a second viewing. at least. maybe even a third. then, in order to fully understand it it helps doing some homework. I know I did. read almost all Ellroy's novels. Watched almost everything Ayer wrote. and also his previous movie Harsh Times. there are a lot of influences in this movie. after all, this is the post-modernist age...or are we leaving that one behind as well ? anyway... the first thing that 'hits' you as you sit in the theater chair is the score . it just blends in with the images, as if it's organic. it just insinuates itself in your ears, wraps you around...and you're caught. and don't even know what happened. The movie… It's not a masterpiece, it's not gonna redefine the history of cinema. But it's a well made, well-thought movie. It's not just another cop movie ; it's not "the poor man's LA Confidential" as someone wrote . If it were to be defined in such terms, I'd say it's "LA Confidential" and "White Jazz" ( the novels ) mixed, stirred, not shaken ( or was it the other way around ? ) filmed by the man that made "Harsh Times". It's Ellroy's writing, with all his classic trademark notes, and Ayer's camera. It doesn't glorify cops; it doesn't judge them either. It just puts up a mirror : if the reflected image looks ugly, don't blame the mirror… blame reality. If anything, it's an ironic ode to the last "lone ranger"- but in this case it's not Wyatt Earp, it's just an obscure LAPD cop. Times have changed, legal system has been overtaken by procedures and technicalities and lawyers that can twist words such as a murderer can walk out of court with a grin on his face, all based on a tiny slip of the law…LAPD's answer to all this is Tom Ludlow. He follows different rules ; he defines justice on his own terms. The ancient terms. The law of the street. But he does not enjoy it. It's a duty, not a passion. He takes no pleasure in the pain he inflicts upon others ; deep down inside, it hurts him too. All those images haunt him, but he never complains . Instead, he just goes more and more out of control. And we gradually learn that he was shaped to become that way ; that his mentor noticed his temper and turned Tom into his weapon. A weapon he uses according to his own agenda. And everyone manipulates him. And he's a loner par excellence. Can't relate to people, can't relate to his own emotions. So he drinks to drown them. Ludlow is not an alcoholic ; he doesn't drink to stop the shakes; he drinks to numb his feelings. And it's not working. The movie also touches the "why's" of corruption. For some cops it's about money, for some it's about dope ; for some it's about power. For Ludlow, it's about the purpose justifies the means. He breaks the rules for justice – or his idea of justice. All he wants is to 'get the bad people', whatever it takes. The irony is that this wreck train, this loose cannon, this half-demented character is in fact an innocent. Ludlow is just a soldier, following orders, and a code of honor that goes only one way. He's just a pawn – and he'll have the fate of a pawn. Used both to open the game and to end it… He's used and framed by the people he considers his 'family'. After all, he's a victim of his colleagues' actions, and of his own self-destructive nature. Survives betrayal, yet he doesn't really change. And as the movie develops, Ludlow's eyes begin to open…just to realize that what it looks like is not always what it is . he gets tangled in the spider's web…and there's no way out. Acting : while the 'guest actors' fit their roles to a good extent, I'm not quite sure what Jay Mohr is doing in this movie. Forrest Whitaker's captain Wander is a 2008 rendition of a typical Ellroy character. As for Keanu Reeves…he just IS Ludlow… he was so believable it hurts. After Constantine and Bob Arctor, I thought I've seen everything. Well, I was wrong. ;) | A Scanner Darkly (2006) – 2009-06-06 00:17:17 |
| poor, poor black-and-white wolf... I love this movie to tears. no, really. it's one of the very few movies that could make me cry . literally. It's just...something else. It's ( the best adaptation ever of) PKD meets Waking Life. and while Downey and Harrelson had a field day with their characters, Reeves delivered one of his best performances ever. but I still wish Linklater had given more space to the New Path events, in the third part. it seems a bit rushed. and considering it was mainly a DVD release, 10-15 more minutes could have helped understanding the story better. but I still love it... |